CORRELATION BETWEEN ABILITY TO RECOGNIZE SENTENCE ERRORS AND ABILITY TO PRODUCE GRAMMATICALLY CORRECT UTTERANCES
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language Testing in Practice: Designing and Developing Useful Language Tests: OUP Oxford.
FCIT. (2016). Classroom Assessment. Retrieved 10 January 2016, from http://fcit.usf.edu/assessment/selected/responsec.html
Kuncel, N. R., & Sackett, P. R. (2014). Resolving the assessment center construct validity problem (as we know it). Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 38.
Lee, H., & Winke, P. (2013). The differences among three-, four-, and five-option-item formats in the context of a high-stakes English-language listening test. Language Testing, 30(1), 99-123.
Matlock-Hetzel, S. (1997). Basic Concept in Item and Test Analysis. Retrieved 10 January, 2016, from http://ericae.net/ft/tamu/Espy.htm
Messick, S. (1989). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment. Educational researcher, 18(2), 5-11.
Read, J. (2015). Assessing English Proficiency for University Study: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rogers, W. T., & Harley, D. (1999). An empirical comparison of three-and four-choice items and tests: susceptibility to testwiseness and internal consistency reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(2), 234-247.
Zheng, Y., & De Jong, J. (2011). Research note: Establishing construct and concurrent validity of Pearson Test of English Academic: Pearson Academic Ltd.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/ej.v5i1.1662
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.