VALIDITAS KONSTRUK MENGGUNAKAN PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS (PCA) DALAM PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN IMPLEMENTASI PAKEM GURU MADRASAH IBTIDAIYAH DI PROVINSI ACEH

Salma Hayati

Abstract


This paper illustrates the development of instrument implementation of PAKEM for teachers at Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (Islamic primary school). The Active, Creative, Effective and Fun Learning (Pembelajarn Aktif Kreatif Efektif dan Menyenangkan - PAKEM) is a learning approach that is implemented in Indonesiaas an effort for the success ofthe Indonesia’s teaching learning process. This instrument was developed from the literatures and some previous research instruments that have been tested to 169 teachers of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah as the samples. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is used to determine the Alpha Cronbach Value and the consistency instruments that are developed. The final instrument consisted of 21 items instruments and produced six factors, namely Penerapan Pendekatan Pembelajaran (implementation of learning approach), Perencanaan Kegiatan Pembelajaran (planning of learning activities), Perencanaan Alat dan Bahan Mengajar (planning of teaching tools), PerencanaanEvaluasi Pembelajaran (planning of learning evaluation), Kegiatan Pembelajaran (teaching activities) and Penerapan Evaluasi Pembelajaran (implementation of learning evaluation). The Alpha Cronbach value for the entire instrument is 0. 832 and ranged between 0777-0535. These results showed that PCA will help the researchers to complete the development of this instrument. Further research with more samples is required.

Keywords


Validity; construct; instrumen; PCA; PAKEM

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agnes Goni. 2008. Penerapan pembelajaran aktif, kreatif, efektif dan menyenangkan (PAKEM) di Sekolah Dasar, J. Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan 4 (1): 93-102.

Ayi Suherman. 2010. Model pembelajaran PAKEM dalam pendidikan jasmani di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan 11(1): 131-141.

Barry, K., & King, L. (1993). Beginning Teaching (2nd ed. ). Wentworth Falls: Social Science Press.

Bloom, B. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives handbook I: The cognitive domain, (Ed. ) New York: David McKay Company, Inc.

Cooper, Bruce S. & Bussey, John. 1982. Collective Bargaining, Strikes and Related Costs in Education. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon, ERIC Center for Education Management.

Chua, Y. P. 2009. Analisis Regrasi, Faktor Analisis dan analisis SEM. Malaysia: McGraw-Hill.

Daniel Fasko. 2000-2001. Education and creativiti. J. R. Creativity Research Journal, Vol. 13, Nos. 3 & 4: 317–327.

Hamzah B. Uno & Nurdin Mohamad. 2011. Belajar dengan Pendekatan Pembelajaran Aktif Inovatif Lingkungan Kreatif Efektif Menarik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Klem, A., & Connell, J. 2004. Relationships Matter: Linking Teacher Support to Student Engagement and Achievement. The Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262-273.

Manning, M. L., & Bucher, K. T. 2005. Teaching in the middle school. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

Miller, R. L., Acton, C., Fullerton, D. A. & Maltby, J. 2002. SPSS for Social Scientists. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

Moore, R. dan Moore, M. 2004. Active teaching and Learning Strategies: Creating a Blueprint for Success. Trafford Publishing (UK) Ltd: UK.

Mulyasa. 2008. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Bandung: Rosda Karya.

Nurdin. 2009. Peningkatan prestasi belajar siswa melalui pendekatan PAKEM, J. Adm. Pendidikan Vol. X No. 2: 111-119.

Norusis, M. J. 2005. SPSS 13. 0 Statistical Procedures Companion. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.

Pallant, J. 2005. SPSS Survival Manual: a Step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. Edisi ke-4. Australia: Allen & Unwin.

Raka Joni. 1993. Pendekatan Pembelajaran: Acuan Konsep Pengelolaan Kegiatan Belajar-Mengajar. Jakarta: Ditjen Dikti.

Riezky Maya Brobosari, Alvi Rosyidi, dan Yuliana Indah W. 2007. Aplikasi PAKEM model kerja ilmiah sederhana untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar biologi. Paedagogia 1(2): 93-103.

Rosyada, D. 2004. Paradigma Pendidikan Demokratis: Sebuah Model Pelibatan Masyarakat dalam Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

R. Madhakomala 2008. PAKEM (Pembelajaran Aktif, Kreatif, Efektif, Menyenangkan), Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Tahun XI (1): 63-82.

Suryanto. 1988. Metode Statistika Multivariat. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Sztejnberg, A., den Brok, P., & Hurek, J. (2004). Preferred Teacher-Student Interpersonal Behaviour: Differences Between Polish Primary and Higher Education Students' Perceptions. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 39(2), 32-40.

Tek Ong Eng & Y. Koon Peng. 2003. Pengajaran Sains Berteraskan Pandangan Kontruktivisme terhadap Pembelajaran. Penang Malaysia: Seamed Recsam.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/aricis.v1i0.937

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.