SIMPLE LAWSUIT IN SHARIA ECONOMIC DISPUTES. A CASE STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 1/PDT.G.S/2019/PA.KDS

Luqman Nurhisam, Nahara Eriyanti

Abstract


As the activities of the Sharia economy develop, the number of Sharia economic dispute cases submitted to the Religious Court has increased. One of the cases decided by the Kudus Religious Court is the Breach of Contract Lawsuit with Decision Number 1/P.dt.G.S/2019/PA.Kds. The Supreme Court issued Regulation Number 14 of 2016 concerning Procedures for the Settlement of Sharia Economic Disputes, which includes simple lawsuits and ordinary lawsuits. Simple lawsuits are further regulated in Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2015, which was later amended to Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2019 concerning Procedures for the Settlement of Simple Lawsuits. This regulation aims to ensure that the resolution of Sharia economic disputes is simpler, faster, and less costly. This research aims to analyze the process and mechanism for resolving simple Sharia economic dispute lawsuits at the Kudus Religious Court, examine the judges' considerations in deciding Sharia economic dispute cases, and identify challenges in resolving Sharia economic disputes. The type of research used is field research with a qualitative approach, utilizing primary, secondary, and tertiary data. The results of the study show that the process and considerations of the judges in Decision Number 1/P.dt.G.S/2019/PA.Kds are in accordance with applicable regulations. However, the resolution of the case takes quite a long time. Therefore, judges in the Religious Courts are required to have competence in Sharia economic law to handle cases more effectively and efficiently.


Keywords


Lawsuit, Simple Lawsuit, Ordinary Lawsuit, Sharia Economic Dispute

Full Text:

PDF

References


Books

Manan, Abdul. (2016). Hukum Ekonomi Syariah. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Djamil, Faturrahman. (2014). Penyelesaian Pembiayaan Bermasalah Di Bank Syariah. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Suadi, Amran. (2017). Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah : Teori Dan Praktik. Jakarta: Kencana.

Harahap, M. Yahya. (1997). Beberapa Tinjauan Mengenai Sistm Peradilan Dan Penyelesaian Sengketa. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Harahap, M. Yahya. (2015). Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Sembiring, Jimmy Joses. (2011). Cara Menyelesaikan Sengketa Di Luar Pengadilan. Jakarta: Transmedia Pustaka.

Journals

Ariani, Nevey Varida. (2018). Gugatan Sederhana Dalam Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 18, (3), 381.

Usrin, M. (2018). Analisis Yuridis Asas Peradilan Sederhana Cepat Dan Biaya Ringan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana, 16, (1), 64.

Noor, Muhammad. (2020). Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana Di Pengadilan (Small Claim Court) Berdasarkan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2015, Yudisia : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Dan Hukum Islam, 11, (1), 57.

Riskawati, Shanti. (2018). Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 Tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana Sebagai Instrumen Perwujudan Asas Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat, dan Biaya Ringan, VeJ, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Brawijaya Malang 4, (1), 136.

Priyanto, Wasis. (2018). Pemeriksaan Gugatan Sederhana (Small Claim Court), Wasis so Nice, 1-2.

Rifa’i, Akhmad. (2010). Konflik Dan Resolusinya Dalam Prespektif Islam, Jurnal Millah Edisi Khusus, Fak. Dakwah UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 172-173.

Muaidi, (2018). Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Hukum Ekonomi Syari’ah, Tafaqquh : Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Dan Ahwal as Syahsiyah, 3, (II).

Hariyanto, Erie. (2014). Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Indonesia, Iqtishadia 1,(1), 42.

Eko Priadi, Erwin Munthe, Keabsahan Putusan Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Indonesia, Iqtishaduna: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Kita 8, (1), 3. diakses pada 14 November, 2022, https://ejournal.-stiesyariah-bengkalis.ac.id/index.php/iqtishaduna/article/view/148

Setiady, Tri, (2015). Arbitrase Islam Dalam Respektif Islam Dan Hukum Positif, Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 9, (3). 343, diakses pada 14 November, 2022, https://jurnal.-fh.unila.ac.id/index.php/fiat/article/view/604/543

Laws and Regulations

PERMA, “Pasal 4 Ayat 4 Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2015, ‘Tata Cara Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana Berbunyi : Penggugat Dan Tergugat Wajib Menghadiri Secara Langsung Setiap Persidangan Dengan Atau Tanpa Didampingi Oleh Kuasa Hukum.’” (2015).

PERMA, Pasal 5 Ayat (2) Tahun 2015 dan Nomor 4 Tahun 2019 “Perubahan Atas Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 Tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana” (2019).

PERMA, Nomor 2 Tahun 2008 Tentang "Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah” (2008).

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Pasal 49 Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 Tentang "Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 Tentang Peradilan Agama” (2006).

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 Tentang “Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 Tentang Peradilan Agama” (2006).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/dusturiyah.v14i2.25842

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Luqman Nurhisam, Nahara Eriyanti

 
Indexed by:

Justisia Justisia Justisia Justisia Justisia

 
Tools:

Justisia Justisia Justisia Justisia Justisia

All papers published in Dusturiyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



Office address: Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry. Jl. Ar-Raniry, Kopelma Darussalam, Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Aceh, Indonesia 23111. Email: jurnal.dusturiyah@ar-raniry.ac.id