The Influence of Herbarium-STEM on Students’ Interest of Becoming the Plant Taxonomists

Samsuar Samsuar

doi:10.22373/biotik.v13i1.26029

The Influence of Herbarium-STEM on Students’ Interest of Becoming the Plant Taxonomists

Samsuar Samsuar

Abstract

Taxonomy study in Indonesia is still a concern due to non-innovative learning methods that cause students not interested in learning and conducting research on it. Consequently, it was impacted by the lack of Indonesian Plant Taxonomists. This research aimed to determine the influence of Herbarium-STEM on students' interest in becoming The Plant Taxonomist. It was quasi-experimental research using one group pre-test and post-test design. The sample was 35 college students chosen by using a purposive sampling technique. The data was gathered using pre-test and post-test techniques of questionnaire distribution. Data analysis was carried out with SPSS by 1) descriptive quantitative analysis on interest; 2) analysis of increasing interest using the N-Gain test; 3) hypothesis analysis using t-test and R2. The results were obtained: 1) the average value of the pre-test on interest was 40,14 (low category) while the post-test was 80,71 (high category); 2) the average value of the N-Gain test on increasing interest was 0,70 (high category); 3) the result of t-test was 0,00 < 0,05 and the result of R² test was 0,614. Thus, Herbarium-STEM influences students' interest in becoming plant taxonomists, with a high level of influence at 61,4%.

Keywords

Herbarium-STEM; Interest; The Plant Taxonomists.

Full Text:

PDF

References

K. Von Rintelen, E. Arida, and C. Häuser, “A review of biodiversity-related issues and challenges in megadiverse Indonesia and other Southeast Asian countries,” RIO Res. Ideas Outcomes, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2017, doi: 10.3897/rio.3.e20860.

J. Jompa, A. F. Koropitan, B. Juliandi, and E. Al, Sains Untuk Biodiversitas Indonesia, 1st ed. Jakarta Pusat: Akademi Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (AIPI).

A. Setiawan and K. Kunci, “Keanekaragaman Hayati Indonesia: Masalah dan Upaya Konservasinya,” Indones. J. Conserv., vol. 11, no. 01, pp. 13–21, 2022, doi: 10.15294/ijc.v11i1.34532.

B. Kurniawan and R. S. Kasiamdari, “Diversity , Abundance , and Traditional Uses of Asteraceae Species in Mount Bisma , Dieng Plateau , Kejajar , Wonosobo , Central Java,” J. Trop. Biodivers. Biotechnol., vol. 07, no. 01, 2022, doi: 10.22146/jtbb.66953.

S. Retnowati, Rugayah, and J. . Rahajoe, Status Keanekaragaman Hayati Indonesia, 1st ed. Jakar: LIPI Press, 2019.

C. Kusmana et al., “KEANEKARAGAMAN HAYATI FLORA DI INDONESIA The Biodiversity of Flora in Indonesia,” J. Pengelolaan Sumberd. Alam dan Lingkung., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 187–198, 2015, doi: 10.19081/jpsl.5.2.187.

S. A. Thomson et al., “Taxonomy based on science is necessary for global conservation,” PLOS Biol., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1–12, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005075.

D. L. Pearson, A. L. Hamilton, and T. L. Erwin, “Recovery Plan for the Endangered Taxonomy Profession,” Bio Sci., vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 58–63, 2020, doi: 10.1525/bio.2011.61.1.11.

I. Löbl, B. Klausnitzer, M. Hartmann, and F. Krell, “The Silent Extinction of Species and Taxonomists — An Appeal to Science Policymakers and Legislators,” J. Technol. Sci. Educ., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1–17, 2019, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jotse.231.

M. C. Orr, J. S. Ascher, M. Bai, D. Chesters, and C. Zhu, “Three questions: How can taxonomists survive and thrive worldwide?,” Megataxa, vol. 001, no. 1, pp. 19–27, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.11646/megataxa.1.1.4.

Ariyansyah, “Penerapan Beberapa Keterampilan Abad 21 Melalui Metode Kuliah Lapangan ( Field Trip ) untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran Taksonomi Tumbuhan Tingkat Rendah,” Oryza J. Pendidik. Biol., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2018, doi: https://doi.org./10.33627/oz.v7i1.11.

Y. Krisnawati and L. Fitriani, “PENGEMBANGAN LEMBAR KERJA MAHASISWA (LKM) BERBASIS EKSPLORASI JAMUR MAKROSKOPIS,” BIOEDUSAINS J. Pendidik. Biol. dan Sains, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 8–23, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.31539/bioedusains.v3i1.1290.

Amri and J. Jafar, “Analisis Kesulitan Mahasiswa Menghafal Nama-nama Latin di Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi Angkatan 2014 Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Parepare,” J. Biotek, vol. 4, no. 262–277, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.25252/jb.v4i2.1797.

M. Saptasari, “Peningkatan Minat Mahasiswa pada Taksonomi Tumbuhan di Perguruan Tinggi,” J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 196–203, 2012.

D. Andayani, V. R. Puspa, N. Muhammad, Y. Istiqlal, and B. Aceh, “Hubungan Tingkat Partisipasi Mahasiswa pada E-Learning Mata Kuliah Botani Tumbuhan Tinggi Berbasis RQA dengan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa The Relationship Between Student Participation Rates in E-Learning Vascular Plant Subject Based on RQA with Student Learn,” J. Jeumpa, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 166–175, 2023, doi: 10.33059/jj.v10i1.7611.

L. Maskour, A. Alami, B. Agorram, and M. Zaki, “STUDY OF SOME LEARNING DIFFICULTIES IN PLANT CLASSIFICATION STUDY OF SOME LEARNING DIFFICULTIES IN PLANT,” in The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences (EPESS), 2016, pp. 294–297.

L. Maskour, A. Alami, M. Zaki, and B. Agorram, “education sciences Plant Classification Knowledge and Misconceptions among University Students in Morocco,” Educ. Sci., vol. 9, no. 48, pp. 1–20, 2019, doi: 10.3390/educsci9010048.

E. Y. Wijaya, D. A. Sudjimat, A. Nyoto, and U. N. Malang, “Transformasi pendidikan abad 21 sebagai tuntutan pengembangan sumber daya manusia di era global,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika 2016 - Universitas Kanjuruhan Malang, 2016, vol. 1, pp. 263–278.

S. S. Sabon and Widodo, “EVALUASI SISTEM PENDIDIKAN KEGURUAN UNTUK SEKOLAH DASAR,” J. Penelit. Kebijak. Pendidik., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 49–68, 2021, doi: 10.24832/jk.v15i1.282.

H. Kanematsu and D. M. Barry, STEM and ICT Education in Intelligent Environment, 1st ed. United Kingdom: Springer International Publishing, 2016.

I. I. Salame and S. Nazir, “The Impact of Supplemental Instruction on the Performance and Attitudes of,” Int. J. Chem. Educ. Res., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 53–59, 2016, doi: 10.20885/ijcer.vol.

N. P. Wahyuni and N. Gianyar, “Penerapan Pembelajaran Berbasis Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPA untuk,” J. Educ. Action Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 109–117, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.23887/jear.v5i1.31554.

M. Honey, B. Alberts, H. Bass, and E. Al, Stem Education For the Future, 1st ed. New York: U.S National Science Foundation, 2020.

Dikrullah, M. Rapi, and Jamilah, “PENGEMBANGAN HERBARIUM BOOK SEBAGAI MEDIA PEMBELAJARAN BIOLOGI MATA KULIAH STRUKTUR TUMBUHAN TINGGI,” J. Biotek, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 15–25, 2018.

P. Handayani, M. Napitupulu, and Hadap, “PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MEDIA HERBARIUM DAN MEDIA GAMBAR PADA MATERI TUMBUHAN BERBIJI (Spermathopyta) DI KELAS X SMA SWASTA ERIA MEDAN,” J. PELITA Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 83–87, 2016.

Mualimaturrochmah, A. Retnoningsih, and M. Rahayuningsih, “Pteridophyta Herbarium Based on Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematic in Plantae Material in Senior High School,” J. Innov. Sci. Educ., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 126–135, 2020.

W. Artika, Samsuar, M. . Sarong, Mailizar, and I. . Sari, “Measurement of Students Learning Outcomes through the Application of Smartphone Microscope,” in 2021 2nd SEA-STEM International Conference (SEA-STEM), 2021, pp. 164–167. doi: 10.1109/SEA-STEM53614.2021.9668129.

Samsuar, W. Artika, M. . Sarong, H. Rahmatan, and A. U. . Pada, “Smartphone microscope based on the STEM approach as a practicum tool to improve students’ scientific aatitudes on Animalia,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1882, no. 1, p. 012158, 2021, doi: 10.1088./1742/-6596/1882/1/012158.

J. R. Frankel, N. E. H. Wallen, and H. Hellen, How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill., 2012.

S. Nurhasanah and A. Sobandi, “Minat belajar sebagai determinan hasil belajar siswa,” J. Pendidik. Manaj. PERKANTORAN, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 128–135, 2018, doi: https//doi.org/23.87/jear.v5i1.31554.

E. Knekta, A. A. Rowland, L. A. Corwin, and S. Eddy, “Measuring university students ’ interest in biology : evaluation of an instrument targeting Hidi and Renninger ’ s individual interest,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 7, no. 23, pp. 2–16, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00217-4.

H. N. Boone Jr and D. A. Boone, “Analyzing Likert Data,” J. Ext., vol. 50, no. 2, 2012, doi: 10.34068/joe.50.02.48.

S. Arikunto, Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan, 3rd ed. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2021.

R. Hake, “Lessons from The Physics Education Reform Effort,” Conserv. Ecol., vol. 5, no. 2, 2002.

E. D. Meltzer, “The Reactionship Between Mathematics Preparation and Conceptual Learning Gains in Physics: A possible Hidden Variable in Diagnostic Pretest Scores,” J. Phys, vol. 70, no. 12, pp. 1259-1268., 2002, doi: 10.1119/1.1514215.

A. Sudijono, Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Raja. Grafindo Persada., 2012.

M. J. Susilo, "Analisis Kualitas Media Pembelajaran Insektarium dan Herbarium untuk Mata Pelajaran Biologi Sekolah Menengah". Jurnal Bioedukatika, vol. 3 no. 1, pp. 123-130., 2015.

A. Septiani, "Penerapan Asesmen Kinerja Dalam Pendekatan STEM (Sains Teknologi Engineering Matematika) Untuk Mengungkap Keterampilan Proses Sains," Prosiding SNPBS (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Biologi dan Saintek), vol -, pp. 654-659., 2016.

R. Rockland, D. S. Bloom, J. Carpinelli, L. Burr-Alexander, L. S. Hirsch, H. Kimmel, "Advancing The “E”In K-12 STEM Educations. Electronic the journals of technology,": vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 53-64., 2010.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/biotik.v13i1.26029