THE DESCRIPTION OF SELF CONTROL IN PERPETRATORS OF CYBERBULYING
Abstract
The use of technology and information can increase the risk of the phenomenon of cyberbullying. One of the factors of cyberbullying is self-control. Individuals with high self-control will be able to instruct and control themselves in facing unexpected situations. In contrast, individuals with low self-control lack instruction and control for themselves; hence they tend to behave negatively. This study engaged a descriptive quantitative method using a cluster random sampling of 100 students. The instrument used in this study was a self-control scale. The data were analyzed by engaging descriptive analysis. The result shows that perpetrators of cyberbullying have moderate self-control. High self-control indicates that students can control their behavior, cognition, and decision. Thus, they can control their behavior in various situations to obtain positive consequences. Low self-control indicates that students do some unacceptable actions to their environment, especially in school. The higher self-control is, the lower the negative behavior individuals will take. Suboptimal self-control is caused by low aspects of self-control in behavior, cognition, and decision. The lowest aspect is behavior control, which means that perpetrators of cyberbullying tend to spend time with their peers. Therefore, self-control does not work optimally.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Acocella, J, R., & Calhoun, J.F (1990). Psikologi tentang penyesuaian dan hubungan kemanusian: IKIP Press.
Astuti, W., Muna, Z., & Julistia, R. (2021). Gambaran kontrol diri pada siswa SMP Kota Lhokseumawe dalam mencegah perilaku seksual pranikah. Jurnal Diversita, Vol 7 (1), 72-78
Averill, J, R. (1973). Personal Control Over Aversive Stimuli and It’s Relationship to Stress. Psychological Bulletin.
Creswell, J, W. (2016). Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Campuran, Edisi Keempat (Cetakan Kesatu). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Dariyo. (2004). Emotional Parenting. PT: Nuansa Aksara.
Ghufron, M, N., & Risnawati, R. (2017). Teori-Teori Psikologi. PT: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Hinduja, S. & Patchin, J, W. (2010). Cyberbullying and self-esteem: Journal of School Health. 55 (2): 1-8
Hurlock, E., B. (1980). Psikologi Perkembangan: Suatu Pendekatan Sepanjang Rentang Kehidupan. PT: Erlangga.
Hurriyanti, D. (2013). Hubungan antara kontrol diri dengan perilaku agresif pada anggota polisi resort pagar alam. Skripsi.
Li, Q. (2005). New bottle but old wine: A research of Cyberbullying in schools. Computer in human behavior.
Mawardah & Adiyanti. (2014). Regulasi emosi dan kelompok teman sebaya perilaku cyberbullying. Jurnal Psikologi. Vol 41, No 1.
Rifauddin, M. (2016). Fenomena cyberbullying pada remaja. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan Informasi dan Kearsipan Khizanah Al-Hikmah, Vol 4 (4), 35-44
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian: Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Williard, N., E. (2007). Cyberbullying and Cyberthreats: Responding to the Challenge of Online Social Aggression, Threat and Distress,
Champaign, IL: Research Press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/psikoislamedia.v8i1.15078
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Yara Andita Anastasya, Rini Julistia, Widi Astuti
Published by Faculty of Psychology UIN Ar-Raniry
Journal Secretariat:
Jl. Syeikh Abdur Rauf, Fakultas Psikologi, Kopelma Darussalam UIN Ar-Raniry, Banda Aceh, 23111,
e-mail: psikoislamedia@ar-raniry.ac.id
INDEXED BY:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.